Home > Snowboards > Comparison

Compare	Ride Crush Wide Snowboard 2013	VS	Salomon Riot Wide Snowboard

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

There are 17 differences and 16 similarities between Ride Crush Wide Snowboard 2013, Salomon Riot Wide Snowboard

Specifications
Product ID		280,975	vs	284,155
	[X] Add Comment about “Product ID”
Shipping Restriction		This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Shipping Restriction”
Skill Range		Intermediate-advanced	vs	Intermediate-advanced
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Range”
Shape		Twin	vs	Twin
	[X] Add Comment about “Shape”
Flex		Soft	vs	Soft
	[X] Add Comment about “Flex”
Pipe Oriented		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Pipe Oriented”
Board Width		Wide	vs	Wide
	[X] Add Comment about “Board Width”
Waist Width		261 mm	vs	260 mm(
	[X] Add Comment about “Waist Width”
Stance Width		559 mm	vs	20 mm
	[X] Add Comment about “Stance Width”
Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length		8.65 M	vs	8.2 m(
	[X] Add Comment about “Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length”
Rocker Profile		Rocker	vs	Flat
	[X] Add Comment about “Rocker Profile”
Rocker Type		Lowrize Rocker	vs	Flat Profile
	[X] Add Comment about “Rocker Type”
Hole Pattern		Standard 4 Hole	vs	Standard 4 Hole
	[X] Add Comment about “Hole Pattern”
Magnatraction		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Magnatraction”
Core Material		Wood	vs	Wood
	[X] Add Comment about “Core Material”
Core Name		Foundation Tuned Core	vs	Aspen Strong
	[X] Add Comment about “Core Name”
Construction Type		Sidewall Construction	vs	Sidewall Construction
	[X] Add Comment about “Construction Type”
Base Material		Extruded P-tex	vs	Sintered P-tex
	[X] Add Comment about “Base Material”
Stance Setback		Centered	vs	Centered
	[X] Add Comment about “Stance Setback”
Base Name		Fusion 1500	vs	Sintered
	[X] Add Comment about “Base Name”
Additional Details		Biaxial Glass: 90 And 0 Degree Angles, Fun And Forgiving,2x4 Inserts	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Details”

General
Brand		Ride	vs	Salomon
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Model Year		2013	vs	2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Model Year”
Gender		Mens	vs	Mens
	[X] Add Comment about “Gender”
recommended use		All-mountain Freestyle	vs	Freestyle
	[X] Add Comment about “recommended use”
Skill Level		Intermediate	vs	Intermediate
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Level”
warranty		1 Year	vs	2 Year
	[X] Add Comment about “warranty”

Description
Description 1		Thin Con: Thin Construction With Tapered Tip And Tail, Reduced Swing Weight, Enhanced Tip Flex And The Sidewall Runs Past The Effective Edge	vs	Flat Profile-flat Profile For Catch Free Spins, Honest Presses And Stability
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 1”
Description 2		Foundation Tuned Core: Tip-to-tail Wood Core With Proven Durability That Retains Pop And Flex	vs	Royal Rubber Rails-thicker, Softer Rubber Absorbs Impacts And Reduces Chatter While You Ride. Those Same Qualities Protect Your Edges From Blowouts.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 2”
Description 3		Membrain Top Sheet: Weighing Less Than Half Of Traditional Plastic Top Sheets, Membrain Maintains A Smooth Feel By Infusing Urethane Into Fabric.	vs	Popster-maximize The Natural Snap And Powerful Pop Of Wood With Popstes Shaped Core Profile. Feels Like Your Skateboard Kicktail Finally Connected With Your Snowboard.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 3”
Description 4		Cleave Edge: Nearly 50 Percent More Steel, Delivers Unmatched Resistance To Edge Cracking And Can Be Detuned To A Larger Radii	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 4”
Description 5		Biaxial Glass: 90 And 0 Degree Angles, Fun And Forgiving	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 5”
Description 6		2 x	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 6”