Home > Snowboards > Comparison

Compare	Ride Crush Wide Snowboard 2013	VS	Ride Arcade UL Snowboard 2012

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

There are 21 differences and 12 similarities between Ride Crush Wide Snowboard 2013, Ride Arcade UL Snowboard 2012

Specifications
Product ID		280,975	vs	285,126
	[X] Add Comment about “Product ID”
Shipping Restriction		This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.	vs	This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.
	[X] Add Comment about “Shipping Restriction”
Skill Range		Intermediate-advanced	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Range”
Shape		Twin	vs	Twin
	[X] Add Comment about “Shape”
Flex		Soft	vs	Stiff
	[X] Add Comment about “Flex”
Pipe Oriented		No	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Pipe Oriented”
Board Width		Wide	vs	Regular
	[X] Add Comment about “Board Width”
Waist Width		261 mm	vs	251 mm
	[X] Add Comment about “Waist Width”
Stance Width		559 mm	vs	20-22in
	[X] Add Comment about “Stance Width”
Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length		8.65 M	vs	7.2m(157cm)
	[X] Add Comment about “Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length”
Rocker Profile		Rocker	vs	Rocker With Camber
	[X] Add Comment about “Rocker Profile”
Rocker Type		Lowrize Rocker	vs	Hybird Twin
	[X] Add Comment about “Rocker Type”
Hole Pattern		Standard 4 Hole	vs	Standard 4 Hole
	[X] Add Comment about “Hole Pattern”
Magnatraction		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Magnatraction”
Core Material		Wood	vs	Wood With Carbon
	[X] Add Comment about “Core Material”
Core Name		Foundation Tuned Core	vs	Ul Core With Carbon Array 5
	[X] Add Comment about “Core Name”
Construction Type		Sidewall Construction	vs	Sidewall Construction
	[X] Add Comment about “Construction Type”
Base Material		Extruded P-tex	vs	Sintered P-tex
	[X] Add Comment about “Base Material”
Stance Setback		Centered	vs	Centered
	[X] Add Comment about “Stance Setback”
Base Name		Fusion 1500	vs	Ul Base
	[X] Add Comment about “Base Name”
Additional Details		Biaxial Glass: 90 And 0 Degree Angles, Fun And Forgiving,2x4 Inserts	vs	Ul Steel: Same Rockwell Hardness, Built Thinner And Ultra Light, But Not Lacking The Die-hard Ride Durability
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Details”

General
Brand		Ride	vs	Ride
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Model Year		2013	vs	2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Model Year”
Gender		Mens	vs	Mens
	[X] Add Comment about “Gender”
recommended use		All-mountain Freestyle	vs	All-mountain
	[X] Add Comment about “recommended use”
Skill Level		Intermediate	vs	Expert
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Level”
warranty		1 Year	vs	1 Year
	[X] Add Comment about “warranty”

Description
Description 1		Thin Con: Thin Construction With Tapered Tip And Tail, Reduced Swing Weight, Enhanced Tip Flex And The Sidewall Runs Past The Effective Edge	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 1”
Description 2		Foundation Tuned Core: Tip-to-tail Wood Core With Proven Durability That Retains Pop And Flex	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 2”
Description 3		Membrain Top Sheet: Weighing Less Than Half Of Traditional Plastic Top Sheets, Membrain Maintains A Smooth Feel By Infusing Urethane Into Fabric.	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 3”
Description 4		Cleave Edge: Nearly 50 Percent More Steel, Delivers Unmatched Resistance To Edge Cracking And Can Be Detuned To A Larger Radii	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 4”
Description 5		Biaxial Glass: 90 And 0 Degree Angles, Fun And Forgiving	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 5”
Description 6		2 x	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 6”