VS

Home > Snowboards > Comparison

Compare Ride Crush Snowboard 2013 VS Rome Hammerhead Snowboard 2013
 
 
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 18 differences and 15 similarities between Ride Crush Snowboard 2013, Rome Hammerhead Snowboard 2013
 
Specifications
Product ID   
280,971
vs   271,166
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Product ID”

Shipping Restriction   This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States. vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Shipping Restriction”

Skill Range   Intermediate-advanced vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Skill Range”

Shape   Twin vs   Twin  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Shape”

Flex   Soft vs   Soft  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Flex”

Pipe Oriented   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Pipe Oriented”

Board Width   Regular vs   Regular  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Board Width”

Waist Width   
253 mm
vs   257 mm
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Waist Width”

Stance Width   
533 mm
vs   20-25in  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Stance Width”

Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length   
8.65 M
vs   7.1m (153cm)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length”

Rocker Profile   Rocker vs   Flat With Rocker  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rocker Profile”

Rocker Type   Lowrize Rocker vs   Freepop Rocker  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rocker Type”

Hole Pattern   Standard 4 Hole vs   Standard 4 Hole  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Hole Pattern”

Magnatraction   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Magnatraction”

Core Material   Wood vs   Wood  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Core Material”

Core Name   Foundation Tuned Core vs   Pop Core Matrix  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Core Name”

Construction Type   Sidewall Construction vs   Sidewall Construction  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Construction Type”

Base Material   Extruded P-tex vs   Extruded P-tex  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Base Material”

Stance Setback   Centered vs   Centered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Stance Setback”

Base Name   Fusion 1500 vs   Impact Base  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Base Name”

Additional Details   Biaxial Glass: 90 And 0 Degree Angles, Fun And Forgiving,2x4 Inserts vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Additional Details”

Add Comment about “Specifications

cancel
General
Brand   Ride vs   Rome  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Brand”

Model Year   
2013
vs   2013  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Year”

Gender   Mens vs   Mens  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Gender”

recommended use   All-mountain Freestyle vs   Freestyle  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “recommended use”

Skill Level   Intermediate vs   Intermediate  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Skill Level”

warranty   
1 Year
vs   2 Year
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “warranty”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Description
Description 1   Thin Con: Thin Construction With Tapered Tip And Tail, Reduced Swing Weight, Enhanced Tip Flex And The Sidewall Runs Past The Effective Edge vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 1”

Description 2   Foundation Tuned Core: Tip-to-tail Wood Core With Proven Durability That Retains Pop And Flex vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 2”

Description 3   Membrain Top Sheet: Weighing Less Than Half Of Traditional Plastic Top Sheets, Membrain Maintains A Smooth Feel By Infusing Urethane Into Fabric. vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 3”

Description 4   Cleave Edge: Nearly 50 Percent More Steel, Delivers Unmatched Resistance To Edge Cracking And Can Be Detuned To A Larger Radii vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 4”

Description 5   Biaxial Glass: 90 And 0 Degree Angles, Fun And Forgiving vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 5”

Description 6   
2 x
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 6”

Add Comment about “Description

cancel

Compare Ride Crush Snowboard 2013 vs Rome Hammerhead Snowboard 2013 Snowboards


Scroll To Top

saved