Home > Snowboards > Comparison

Compare	Ride Buckwild Snowboard 2013	VS	K2 Fastplant Wide Snowboard 2013

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

There are 15 differences and 18 similarities between Ride Buckwild Snowboard 2013, K2 Fastplant Wide Snowboard 2013

Specifications
Product ID		280,961	vs	281,658
	[X] Add Comment about “Product ID”
Shipping Restriction		This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.	vs	This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.
	[X] Add Comment about “Shipping Restriction”
Skill Range		Advancedintermediate-expert	vs	Advancedintermediate-expert
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Range”
Shape		Twin	vs	Twin
	[X] Add Comment about “Shape”
Flex		Medium	vs	Medium
	[X] Add Comment about “Flex”
Pipe Oriented		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Pipe Oriented”
Board Width		Regular	vs	Wide
	[X] Add Comment about “Board Width”
Waist Width		252 mm	vs	264 mm
	[X] Add Comment about “Waist Width”
Stance Width		559 mm	vs	22 mm
	[X] Add Comment about “Stance Width”
Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length		7.9 M	vs	8 M
	[X] Add Comment about “Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length”
Rocker Profile		Rocker	vs	Rocker
	[X] Add Comment about “Rocker Profile”
Rocker Type		Twin Rocker	vs	Jib Rocker With Tweekends
	[X] Add Comment about “Rocker Type”
Hole Pattern		Standard 4 Hole	vs	Standard 4 Hole
	[X] Add Comment about “Hole Pattern”
Magnatraction		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Magnatraction”
Core Material		Wood With Carbon	vs	Wood With Carbon
	[X] Add Comment about “Core Material”
Core Name		Pop Rods 2.0	vs	Bambooyah Wh4 With Carbon Ollie Bar
	[X] Add Comment about “Core Name”
Construction Type		Sidewall Construction	vs	Sidewall Construction
	[X] Add Comment about “Construction Type”
Base Material		Sintered P-tex	vs	Sintered P-tex
	[X] Add Comment about “Base Material”
Stance Setback		Centered	vs	Centered
	[X] Add Comment about “Stance Setback”
Base Name		Fusion 4000	vs	4,000 Sintered
	[X] Add Comment about “Base Name”
Additional Details		Hybrid Glass: Triaxial On Top, Biaxial On Base, Balanced Torsion And Stiffness For Better Response With Speed,2x4 Inserts	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Details”

General
Brand		Ride	vs	K2
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Model Year		2013	vs	2013
	[X] Add Comment about “Model Year”
Gender		Mens	vs	Mens
	[X] Add Comment about “Gender”
recommended use		Freestyle	vs	All-mountain Freestyle
	[X] Add Comment about “recommended use”
Skill Level		Advanced Intermediate	vs	Advanced Intermediate
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Level”
warranty		1 Year	vs	5 Year
	[X] Add Comment about “warranty”

Description
Description 1		Thin Con: Thin Construction With Tapered Tip And Tail, Reduced Swing Weight, Enhanced Tip Flex And The Sidewall Runs Past The Effective Edge	vs	Jib Rocker: Just Enough Rise In The Tip And Tail To Create A Loose, Buttery Feel On All Types Of Terrain
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 1”
Description 2		Pop Rods 2.0 Core: Gives An Already Fun And Playful Board Added Liveliness To Set Them Apart From The Competition. Made Up Of Flat Carbon Rods That Wrap A Urethane Slime-core, Pop Rods Have Carbon For Massive Pop And A Slim-core To Smooth Out The Landing	vs	Carbon Web I / Ollie Bar: Brings The Pop And Snap Of Carbon Closer To Your Bindings For Maximum Ollies And Control In Every Situation
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 2”
Description 3		Cleave Edge: Nearly 50 Percent More Steel, Delivers Unmatched Resistance To Edge Cracking And Can Be Detuned To A Larger Radii	vs	Riax/icg20 Glass: Integrating Carbon Into The Fiberglass Reducing The Overall Weight
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 3”
Description 4		Carbon Array 3: Power Distribution Provides Total Board Control In Every Stance Location By Using Wide Spread Carbon Stringers To Gather And Channel Rider Input	vs	4,000 Sintered
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 4”
Description 5		Hybrid Glass: Triaxial On Top, Biaxial On Base, Balanced Torsion And Stiffness For Better Response With Speed	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 5”
Description 6		2 x	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 6”