Home > Snowboards > Comparison

Compare	Lib Tech T.Rice Pro C2BTX Snowboard 2013	VS	Ride Buckwild Wide Snowboard 2013

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

There are 21 differences and 12 similarities between Lib Tech T.Rice Pro C2BTX Snowboard 2013, Ride Buckwild Wide Snowboard 2013

Specifications
Product ID		270,974	vs	280,964
	[X] Add Comment about “Product ID”
Shipping Restriction		This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.	vs	This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.
	[X] Add Comment about “Shipping Restriction”
Skill Range		Advanced-pro	vs	Advancedintermediate-expert
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Range”
Shape		Twin	vs	Twin
	[X] Add Comment about “Shape”
Flex		Stiff	vs	Medium
	[X] Add Comment about “Flex”
Pipe Oriented		Yes	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Pipe Oriented”
Board Width		Regular	vs	Wide
	[X] Add Comment about “Board Width”
Waist Width		258 mm(	vs	260 mm
	[X] Add Comment about “Waist Width”
Stance Width		20.25 mm	vs	559 mm
	[X] Add Comment about “Stance Width”
Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length		8.2 m(	vs	7.95 M
	[X] Add Comment about “Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length”
Rocker Profile		Rocker With Camber	vs	Rocker
	[X] Add Comment about “Rocker Profile”
Rocker Type		C2btx	vs	Lowrize Rocker
	[X] Add Comment about “Rocker Type”
Hole Pattern		Standard 4 Hole	vs	Standard 4 Hole
	[X] Add Comment about “Hole Pattern”
Magnatraction		Yes	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Magnatraction”
Core Material		Wood	vs	Wood With Carbon
	[X] Add Comment about “Core Material”
Core Name		H-pop Core	vs	Pop Rods 2.0
	[X] Add Comment about “Core Name”
Construction Type		Sidewall Construction	vs	Sidewall Construction
	[X] Add Comment about “Construction Type”
Base Material		Sintered P-tex	vs	Sintered P-tex
	[X] Add Comment about “Base Material”
Stance Setback		Centered	vs	Centered
	[X] Add Comment about “Stance Setback”
Base Name		Sintered	vs	Fusion 4000
	[X] Add Comment about “Base Name”
Additional Details		Bio Beans Top Sheet	vs	Hybrid Glass: Triaxial On Top, Biaxial On Base, Balanced Torsion And Stiffness For Better Response With Speed,2x4 Inserts
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Details”

General
Brand		Lib Tech	vs	Ride
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Model Year		2013	vs	2013
	[X] Add Comment about “Model Year”
Gender		Mens	vs	Mens
	[X] Add Comment about “Gender”
recommended use		All-mountain Freestyle	vs	Freestyle
	[X] Add Comment about “recommended use”
Skill Level		Expert	vs	Advanced Intermediate
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Level”
warranty		1 Year	vs	1 Year
	[X] Add Comment about “warranty”

Description
Description 1		C2btx Camber	vs	Thin Con: Thin Construction With Tapered Tip And Tail, Reduced Swing Weight, Enhanced Tip Flex And The Sidewall Runs Past The Effective Edge
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 1”
Description 2		H-pop Core	vs	Cleave Edge: Nearly 50 Percent More Steel, Delivers Unmatched Resistance To Edge Cracking And Can Be Detuned To A Larger Radii
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 2”
Description 3		Axis Inversion Fiberglass	vs	Carbon Array 3: Power Distribution Provides Total Board Control In Every Stance Location By Using Wide Spread Carbon Stringers To Gather And Channel Rider Input
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 3”
Description 4		Twin Pointy Pow Shape Andtwin Blunt Jib Shape	vs	Pop Rods 2.0 Core: Gives An Already Fun And Playful Board Added Liveliness To Set Them Apart From The Competition. Made Up Of Flat Carbon Rods That Wrap A Urethane Slime-core, Pop Rods Have Carbon For Massive Pop And A Slim-core To Smooth Out The Landing
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 4”
Description 5		Bio Beans Top Sheet	vs	Hybrid Glass: Triaxial On Top, Biaxial On Base, Balanced Torsion And Stiffness For Better Response With Speed
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 5”
Description 6			vs	2 x
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 6”